|
The Global Leader of Portable Data Acquisition Solutions
|
|
1-888-714-3272 |
IOtech Events |
| Selection Guides | OEM Zone |
Generator Shaft Stress Testing Application Summary In addition, a generator shaft often experiences a peak-load increase for a brief time that may exceed its specified rating. In order to ensure that the generators wont fail, the stresses are recorded and analyzed. Another benefit that comes from monitoring shaft stresses is being able to determine the load limits that the generator can sustain by increasing its average capacity. That is, how high can the average operating loads become before the generator suffers from fatigue and outright failure? Determining a maximum tolerable stress can save the expense of installing another generator shaft or replacing the existing unit with one of a higher rating. The Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) has responsibility for about 75 hydroelectric generating plants around the country, and it is doing exactly this: measuring shaft stresses over a variety of loads and operating conditions to determine the fatigue life and maximum operating capacity of its existing generators. Potential Solution IOtechs Solution Vaughns team installed seven strain gage bridges around the generators shaft to measure axial bending and torsion. The strain gages used for measuring torsion were full bridges, and except for one, the others were half bridges for measuring bending moments. The full bridge used in the bending measurement provided a larger output signal, of course, but did not provide any additional or more accurate data than the half bridges. In an unusual and novel approach, they strapped the LogBook and its battery power supply to the outside of the generator shaft. As the shaft spun at about 100 rpm during the test, so did the Logbook. This let them run the system and gather data without telemetry equipment or slip rings to deliver the data from the strain gages to the data acquisition system. The LogBook stored data on its 128-Mbyte memory card for up to 45 minutes while exposed to 6 or 7 gs continually and 10 gs intermittently. The total test required about two hours, so the generator was run up and down several times with brief interruptions to download the memory card and replace the batteries prior to another round of data acquisition. The hardware held up perfectly under these conditions and let Vaughns team collect all the data they needed for analysis. The stress measurements were recorded while running the generator with a 77-MW load, synchronized to the power grid. Then the machine was cycled between start-up and shutdown with various loads of different power settings to ensure the machine followed a linear behavior, that is, stress proportional to power output. Sometimes these machines pass through rough zones, says Vaughn, So we identify those that might produce worse stress and fatigue, among other issues. We then correlate that data with our known operating history and calculate how many cycles of stress loading cycles at certain stress levels were present. We add it up and calculate the life. In addition to the stress testing, says Vaughn, we can see vibration problems when they occur. We also observed that the start-up stress was about half that of the running stress at full power. This can account for a shorter shaft life, so it has to be factored into the fatigue life equation. Hydro generators have to work harder than steam turbines for example, because the steam turbines run at constant speed without cycling on and off. Measuring rpm was not an issue for the team since the generator runs within 0.1% of the 100 rpm rate, which is synchronized to the power-grid frequency. The generator is typically ramped up to load in 4 to 5 minutes, although it is capable of accelerating to commanded speed within 4 to 5 seconds. Control gates that allow more water to reach the turbine blades increase generator power output, not increasing speed, since it must always remain at 100 rpm. We used the PostView software while at the site, said Vaughn, but imported the data to MathCad for the report. MathCad also let us perform some FFT analyses easily, determine whether we had 60 Hz interference, and remove it mathematically when it appeared. Vaughn also adds that they would have been able to accomplish the task with PostView alone, but felt it was helpful to be able to use nonproprietary software such as MathCad to examine some transient waveforms and oscillations. I would summarize the LogBook operation as going really quite well. We thought the LogBook instructions were clean and easy. We have done three complete fatigue life tests to date and anticipate running many more. In addition, although Vaughns team does not routinely get involved with maintenance issues, they have offered their IOtech equipment and expertise to help that department when they may be able to take advantage of it. Conclusion |